In addition to an increasing appreciation for the feminine principle, both mortal and divine, the eleventh century saw a revaluation of physical love. Some poets had discovered that being in passionate love could change their consciousness, and so they began to see love and sex as means of spiritual illumination. Ancient texts such as Ovid’s works on love (The Art of Love and The Cure of Love), which dealt with love’s transformative power, were read with new appreciation, but the empire was officially Christian, and so these ideas had to be fit into a more or less orthodox Christian framework.
“While Comfort presents an argument regarding the size and shape of the banana, it should be pointed out that similar logic applies to the human penis (thus making it a “phallusy”). Its size is just right to fit into the human rectum, hand or mouth, which are all definite no-nos for fundamentalists—yet the supposed “design” argument could still be applied. [4] If you’re into that sort of thing, that is. In fact, one could even argue that the banana was also designed to be put in the human rectum or vagina; it is shaped correctly, and has a protective outer sheath to ensure firmness. This puts it in a better position than the cucumber, at least.” (via RationalWIki)
Banana: The Athiests Nightmare. (par kingnoodle)
— Les 400 culs: Les femmes sont-elles moins fortes que les hommes?
— 8 Gratuitously Violent Horror Movie Scenes (from the Bible) | Cracked.com
— «Le viol est le seul crime où la victime se sent coupable» - Libération
I. The best type of orgasm (types I and II were lumped together and described as “good sex” orgasms). This one ranked high on both pleasure and physical sensation, with lots of throbbing and euphora.
II. This was the other type of “good sex” orgasm, which ranked very high on pleasure, but lower on physical sensation.
III. The third and the fourth types were classified as “not so good sex” orgasms, I guess because they were too polite to say “bad sex”. This was classified as medium pleasure, but low physical sensation.
IV. The lowest of the low, this one was low pleasure and sensation. Generally not great.
— A Skeptical Scrutiny of the Works and Theories of Wilhelm Reich

