“If Swedish interrogators want to interrogate him they can do it in London. Everyone in their right mind knows that this is a stepping stone to the US.” Chomsky draws a parallel with Bradley Manning, the US soldier accused of having leaked thousands of classified documents to Wikileaks, and says that what to happened Manning is a clear indication of how Assange will be treated if he is extradited to the United States.
Manning has been held in a military prison for almost a year and a half without trial — most of that time in solitary confinement. “There is no doubt that the purpose of all this is to get [Manning] to say something about Assange, who will also be treated the same way if he ever comes to the US… Therefore, a decent country at this time — if there is one — would grant him political asylum,”
Chomsky says of the Swedish legal system “that one can not rely on it, which is not so surprising.” Sweden cooperated with the Nazis during World War II and is now working with the Americans, he points out. “Sweden cooperates with whoever is in power… suppose that Syria asks Sweden to extradite somebody to Syria whom they accuse works with the rebels — would Sweden do it? No!”
“By right [Assange] ought to get a medal of honour. He’s performing his responsibilities as a citizen of a democratic society and people ought to know what their representatives are doing “
"“Without Facebook, without Twitter, without Youtube, this would not have happened.”
Wael Ghonim’s 60 Minutes Interview: Egypt’s New Age Revolution (par ReaderSupportedNews)
Les plus grands noms de l’industrie informatique se sont prononcés contre Sopa, y compris l’ingénieur Vint Cerf, l’un des fondateurs d’Internet. Il a récemment tiré la sonnette d’alarme sur le fait que SOPA risquait de provoquer « une course aux armements mondiale de censure sans précédent sur le web ». Stuart Baker, un ancien secrétaire d’Etat du ministère de l’intérieur, a également attiré l’attention sur le fait que SOPA causerait « des dommages importants à la sécurité de l’Internet ».
Etant donné que la majorité des membres de la commission semblaient être en faveur de la proposition de loi, décider de repousser celle-ci sera perçue comme un coup majeur porté aux entreprises de médias qui ont fait un lobbying important pour qu’elle passe. Holmes Wilson, co-fondateur de Fight For The Future, un groupe de lobbying, a déclaré : « c’est une victoire importante, même si elle est temporaire. Ce n’est pas ce qu’ils voulaient ».
"— Le projet de loi américain Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) a été ajourné :) - Framablog
Today, unfortunately, the very pillars on which Wikipedia has been built - neutrality, freedom, and verifiability of its contents - are likely to be heavily compromised by paragraph 29 of a law proposal, also known as “DDL intercettazioni” (Wiretapping Act).
This proposal, which the Italian Parliament is currently debating, provides, among other things, a requirement to all websites to publish, within 48 hours of the request and without any comment, a correction of any content that the applicant deems detrimental to his/her image.
Unfortunately, the law does not require an evaluation of the claim by an impartial third judge - the opinion of the person allegedly injured is all that is required, in order to impose such correction to any website.
"WikiLeaks is not perfect, and we have highlighted many of its shortcomings on this website. Nevertheless, it’s time to make a clear statement about the value of the site and take sides:
WikiLeaks stands to improve our democracy, not weaken it.
The greatest threat we face right now from WikiLeaks is not the information it has spilled and may spill in the future, but the reactionary response to it that’s building in the United States that promises to repudiate the rule of law and our free speech traditions, if left unchecked.
"— Why WikiLeaks Is Good for America | Threat Level | Wired.com
Since Wikileaks released the US embassy cables on 28 November it has come under pressure on several fronts, from DDoS sttacks to frozen bank accounts. We list the companies, politicians and organisations making life difficult for Wikileaks and Julian Assange (via Wikileaks under attack: the definitive timeline | Media | guardian.co.uk)
— Don’t shoot messenger for revealing uncomfortable truths | The Australian
